Recent coverage · CHCH · 2024

Advocacy at sentencing.

Bringing a client's circumstances before the court is an important part of sentencing advocacy.

Jason Long · Hamilton · May 2024

Court accepts a joint sentencing submission.

Jason Long was initially charged with first-degree murder in 2021 and later pleaded guilty to second-degree murder. Kim Edward represented him and presented information about his personal background at sentencing.

The judge accepted the sentence jointly proposed by the defence and the Crown: life imprisonment with a 16-year period of parole ineligibility. CHCH reported on Kim’s submissions and the sentence imposed.

CHCH report
CHCH · May 2, 2024

Original charge: Hamilton Police, April 23, 2021

Hamilton Spectator article
Featured · Hamilton Spectator · 2019

Lawyer asks for cultural assessment before Hamilton judge sentences Black man.

In one of the cases that first drew widespread attention to Impact of Race and Culture Assessments (IRCAs) in Ontario, Kim Edward asked the sentencing court to formally consider the cultural and systemic context of her client's life before fixing a sentence.

It was a request that, at the time, was unusual outside of Gladue-style hearings. It opened a broader conversation in Hamilton's courts about how trial judges can — and should — consider the lived experience of racialised defendants at sentencing.

The case has been cited as part of a wider Canadian movement toward more nuanced sentencing, including IRCAs in courts across the country.

Read on The Spec
Case Highlights

A career in verdicts.

A small selection of representative matters Kim has handled across Ontario.

Murder defence case
Murder · Reduced Verdict

First-degree murder reduced to manslaughter at trial.

A careful, motion-driven attack on the Crown's planning-and-deliberation evidence led to a charge reduction and a sentence reflecting the actual circumstances of the case.

Ontario Superior Court·Trial
Drug trafficking case
Drug Trafficking · Charter

Evidence excluded under s. 8 — acquittal entered.

A vehicle stop and warrantless search were found to breach the client's Charter rights. The drugs found in the trunk were excluded under s. 24(2), and the Crown's case collapsed.

Hamilton·Charter Litigation
Bank robbery case
Robbery · ID Evidence

Bank robbery acquittal — eyewitness ID dismantled.

A multi-day trial in which the case turned almost entirely on a single shaky in-dock identification. Cross-examination on lighting, distance, and post-event contamination led to acquittal.

Ontario Court of Justice·Trial
Weapons offence case
Firearms · Possession

Restricted-firearm possession charge withdrawn.

Disclosure review revealed a serious break in continuity of the seized firearm. After a focused pre-trial application, the Crown withdrew the charges before trial.

Hamilton·Pre-Trial Resolution
Sexual assault case
Sexual Assault

Acquittal in historical sexual assault matter.

A careful, sensitive cross-examination — combined with a clear case theory and contemporaneous record analysis — led to an acquittal after a multi-day judge-alone trial.

Ontario Superior Court·Trial
Fraud case
Fraud · Trust

Six-figure fraud allegation resolved without conviction.

A document-heavy trust file resolved through patient pre-trial work — protecting the client's career, professional licensing, and immigration status.

Hamilton·Resolution
Youth court case
Youth · YCJA

Extrajudicial sanction secured for first-time youth offender.

A first-time offence handled outside the conventional trial track — preserving the young person's record, education, and future employment opportunities.

Youth Court·Diversion
Domestic assault case
Domestic · Bail

Bail variation reuniting a family within days.

A domestic charge had imposed a sweeping no-contact order with serious consequences for childcare. Kim secured a contested bail variation within a week of being retained.

Hamilton·Bail
Appeal case
Appeal · Court of Appeal

Successful appeal of trial verdict — new trial ordered.

A trial-level conviction set aside on appeal, with the Court of Appeal ordering a new trial after a careful reframing of the legal issues in factum and oral argument.

Court of Appeal for Ontario·Appeal

Facing a charge? Let's talk.

Confidential first consultations — in office, by phone, or by Zoom.